🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, states are pouring massive amounts into what is known as “sovereign AI” – building their own machine learning systems. Starting with Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, states are vying to develop AI that comprehends native tongues and cultural nuances.

The International AI Arms Race

This initiative is an element in a larger international race dominated by major corporations from the US and China. Whereas companies like a leading AI firm and Meta invest massive funds, mid-sized nations are likewise making their own investments in the AI field.

But amid such vast amounts in play, is it possible for smaller countries achieve significant advantages? As stated by a specialist from a prominent thinktank, If not you’re a rich nation or a major firm, it’s a substantial hardship to create an LLM from the ground up.”

Defence Concerns

A lot of countries are unwilling to use external AI technologies. In India, as an example, US-built AI tools have occasionally proven inadequate. A particular instance saw an AI tool employed to teach students in a distant area – it communicated in English with a thick US accent that was hard to understand for regional users.

Then there’s the defence factor. In India’s defence ministry, relying on certain international models is seen as not permissible. As one developer noted, “It could have some unvetted learning material that might say that, for example, Ladakh is outside of India … Using that specific AI in a security environment is a big no-no.”

He continued, I’ve discussed with experts who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, setting aside particular tools, they are reluctant to rely on American platforms because information could travel outside the country, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

Domestic Projects

In response, several nations are backing domestic initiatives. An example this project is underway in the Indian market, in which a firm is striving to build a national LLM with government backing. This initiative has committed about a substantial sum to AI development.

The expert envisions a AI that is less resource-intensive than leading systems from American and Asian corporations. He explains that India will have to make up for the funding gap with skill. Based in India, we lack the option of pouring billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we contend versus such as the hundreds of billions that the US is pumping in? I think that is where the key skills and the intellectual challenge comes in.”

Native Priority

In Singapore, a government initiative is supporting language models developed in local regional languages. Such tongues – including the Malay language, the Thai language, Lao, Indonesian, the Khmer language and more – are often inadequately covered in Western-developed LLMs.

It is my desire that the experts who are building these national AI tools were informed of just how far and just how fast the frontier is progressing.

A senior director involved in the program says that these systems are created to supplement more extensive models, as opposed to replacing them. Platforms such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he comments, commonly struggle with native tongues and local customs – interacting in unnatural the Khmer language, for instance, or proposing pork-based dishes to Malaysian individuals.

Creating regional-language LLMs permits local governments to code in cultural sensitivity – and at least be “informed users” of a powerful technology developed in other countries.

He continues, I am prudent with the word national. I think what we’re attempting to express is we wish to be better represented and we want to comprehend the features” of AI platforms.

International Cooperation

Regarding states trying to find their place in an intensifying worldwide landscape, there’s a different approach: join forces. Researchers affiliated with a prominent institution recently proposed a state-owned AI venture allocated across a consortium of emerging countries.

They call the project “Airbus for AI”, in reference to Europe’s successful initiative to develop a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the 1960s. This idea would entail the creation of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the assets of different nations’ AI programs – for example the UK, Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a strong competitor to the American and Asian major players.

The lead author of a study setting out the concept says that the proposal has attracted the interest of AI leaders of at least several countries up to now, along with several state AI companies. While it is presently centered on “developing countries”, developing countries – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have also indicated willingness.

He comments, In today’s climate, I think it’s just a fact there’s less trust in the assurances of this current American government. Individuals are wondering such as, should we trust these technologies? In case they opt to